The New York Times
December 16, 2005 Friday
Late Edition - Final
House Votes for 698 Miles of Fences on Mexico Border
BYLINE: By RACHEL L. SWARNS
SECTION: Section A; Column 1; National Desk; Pg. 37
LENGTH: 767 words
DATELINE: WASHINGTON, Dec. 15
House Republicans voted on Thursday night to toughen a border security bill by requiring the Department of Homeland Security to build five fences along 698 miles of the United States border with Mexico to block the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs into this country. The amendment to the bill would require the construction of the fences along stretches of land in California, New Mexico, Texas and Arizona that have been deemed among the most porous corridors of the border. The vote on the amendment was a victory for conservatives who had long sought to build such a fences along the Mexican border. But the vote was sharply assailed by Democrats, who compared the fences to the Berlin Wall in Germany. Twelve Republicans also voted against the amendment. Representative David Dreier, Republican of California, hailed the fences as a necessary tool to ensure border security. Construction of the barriers is to include two layers of reinforced fencing, cameras, lighting and sensors near Tecate and Calexico on the California border; Columbus, N.M.; and El Paso, Del Rio, Eagle Pass, Laredo and Brownsville in Texas. The border security bill, which cracks down on illegal immigration and now mandates the construction of the fences, is expected to pass the House on Friday. ''Border fences are a security tool with proven results,'' Mr. Dreier said. ''This amendment allows us to target our federal resources where they are needed most: five specific border crossings with the highest number of immigrant deaths, instances of drug smuggling and illegal crossings. The vote on the amendment came on a day when the tough border security bill survived an unexpected tactical challenge from several Republicans. The bill was criticized by some moderates because it does not grant millions of undocumented workers the right to work temporarily in the United States and by some conservatives who argued that the measure was not tough enough. The unusual revolt highlighted the schism within the Republican Party over the volatile issue of immigration. Business leaders, traditional allies of the party, have lobbied fiercely against the bill, which contains strict employment verification requirements that many executives view as a burden. Republican leaders stamped out the rebellion after an emergency meeting. But one Republican, Jim Kolbe of Arizona, said he and his allies would continue to try to stop the bill, which has been endorsed by the Republican leadership and some conservatives but attacked by business executives, church leaders and advocates for immigrants. The bill would require mandatory detention of many immigrants, stiffen the penalties for employers who hire them and broaden the immigrant-smuggling statute to include employees of social service agencies and church groups who offer services to undocumented workers. It would not create the temporary guest worker program that President Bush has urged to legalize the status of the 11 million illegal immigrants believed to be living in this country. Seeking to sink the legislation, several Republicans took the tactical step on Thursday of voting against a rule that had to pass to allow the measure to go up for a vote. Some conservatives, who felt the bill was not tough enough, also voted against the rule. ''Unfortunately, the bill before us today does nothing to solve the real problems of immigration,'' Mr. Kolbe told lawmakers. ''But we are going to go down this path, continue this charade, continue lying to the American people, continue pretending we are doing something to prevent illegal immigration.'' In addition to Mr. Kolbe, six other Republicans voted against the rule: Representatives Fred Upton of Michigan, Christopher Shays of Connecticut, Jim Leach of Iowa, Heather A. Wilson of New Mexico, J.D. Hayworth of Arizona, and John Hostettler of Indiana. Mr. Kolbe spoke as faxed letters from the United States Chamber of Commerce warned lawmakers that in its annual ratings of members of Congress, it would penalize any legislator who voted for the rule that would allow the measure to go to the floor for a vote. By midafternoon, the party's leaders had beaten back the challenge, at least for the day. Representative F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Republican of Wisconsin, sharply criticized those expressing support for what many conservatives describe as an amnesty for illegal immigrants. ''This bill doesn't give amnesty to illegal aliens and it shouldn't because that would reward someone for breaking our laws,'' said Mr. Sensenbrenner, who had introduced the border security bill.
C'est ici que tout ce qui concerne les sujets du blog peut être évoqué. C'est un bon moyen de continuer une discussion un peu "à l'étroit"
2 posts •Page 1 of 1
Sources du message :
The International Herald Tribune
December 15, 2005 Thursday
House ready to curb illegal immigrants
BYLINE: Rachel L. Swarns
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 673 words
The Republican-controlled House of Representatives is poised to pass one of the toughest border security measures in more than a decade, cracking down on illegal immigrants and their employers and defying President George W. Bush's call for a comprehensive bill that would grant millions of illegal immigrants already in the United States a right to work here temporarily.The measure, expected to clear the House this week, would for the first time make it a federal crime to live in the United States illegally.That would turn millions of immigrants into felons, ineligible to win any legal status.Currently, living in the United States without a document like a visa or a green card is a violation of civil immigration law, not criminal law. The bill would also broaden the immigrant-smuggling statute to include those who shield or offer support to illegal immigrants. Offenders, including employees of social service agencies and church groups, could face up to five years in prison.The legislation would require the mandatory detention, until removal from the country, of non-Mexican immigrants who are entering the United States illegally, would increase financing for local sheriffs in border states to allow them to detain illegal immigrants and would toughen penalties for employers who hire them.The proposal, which would require the Department of Homeland Security to expand greatly a system intended to verify the immigration status of all the nation's employees, has been hailed by many conservatives in Congress as vital to combating illegal immigration and tightening the border with Mexico.The bill was approved by the House Judiciary Committee last Thursday. The committee chairman, Representative F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Republican of Wisconsin, said it would ''help restore the integrity of our nation's borders and re-establish respect for our laws by holding violators accountable, including human traffickers, employers who hire illegal aliens and alien gang members who terrorize communities.''But the bill has touched off a furor among some business leaders and moderate Republicans, who support Bush's plan to grant temporary legal status to the 11 million illegal immigrants believed to be living in the United States.In recent weeks, a leader of the Chamber of Commerce and 15 Republican moderates have signed letters to senior Republicans in the House, calling anew for enactment of such a guest worker program.With most analysts predicting that the leadership's measure will pass in the House on Thursday, many of its critics are pinning their hopes on the Senate, which is expected to take up a comprehensive immigration bill next year.Representative Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, who sponsored a bipartisan bill including a guest-worker provision, said he felt deeply frustrated by the leadership's bill even though he favored strong border enforcement.''We have a massive work force out there that is undocumented and we've got to deal with them,'' Flake said. ''No one is suggesting that we deport everyone who is here illegally. So that leaves us in a quandary: Do we pretend they don't exist? Or do we bring them out of the shadows?''Hopefully,'' he said, ''the Senate will act responsibly and pass a guest worker plan. I wish we were doing it here.''In a swing through border states last month, Bush said that any legislation should include his guest-worker proposal, which would allow those currently in the United States illegally to work here legally for a few years before being required to return home and, if they chose, apply for re-entry. He dismissed concerns raised by some Republicans who say his plan amounts to amnesty for lawbreakers.''Amnesty would say to other illegal aliens, 'Come, and you can come into America and get citizenship automatically,''' Bush said.''No, I'm for a bill that strengthens our border by providing people with a tamper-proof identity card to let them work in America for jobs Americans won't do, on a temporary basis, and then go back to their country.''